воскресенье, 17 мая 2015 г.

The Chest Pain And The Heart Attack

The Chest Pain And The Heart Attack.
For patients seen in crisis rooms solely for strongbox pain, noninvasive screening tests may not always forecast to be to come heart trouble, a new study suggests. Such tests include: electrocardiograms, which relate the heart's electrical activity, echocardiograms, which compute how well blood is flowing in the heart using ultrasound, and CT scans of the heart. All three tests are recommended for box despair under current guidelines, the study authors said cleansing. "It may be non-poisonous to defer early cardiac stress testing in patients with caddy pain but no evidence of a heart attack," said restraint researcher Dr Andrew Foy, an assistant professor of medicament and public health sciences at the Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center in Hershey, PA.

Foy doesn't mark these tests are overused, but may not be needed in all cases. "Furthermore, primeval cardiac force testing appears to outcome in unnecessary, additional tests and invasive treatments". Around 6 million patients go to the predicament room with chest pain each year in the United States. "Therefore, these findings could import the be concerned of a large number of patients day 4rx. Foy said that for patients with thorax pain not brought on by a heart attack, it seems safe to delay early cardiac stress tests.

So "We would tout they follow up closely with their primary care provider or cardiologist for the best advice on what to do after coffer pain. If the pain returns, then cardiac stress testing may certainly be reasonable, depending on the environment of the pain and their other peril factors for heart disease. The report was published online Jan 26, 2015 in the yearbook JAMA Internal Medicine. For the study, Foy and his colleagues hand-me-down healthiness insurance claims from a group of almost 700000 privately insured patients seen in danger rooms for chest pain in 2011.

From this group, they identified almost 422000 patients, of which more than 293000 did not admit noninvasive tests and rigorous to 128000 did. The most common test in use was a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy - a scan that shows blood well in the heart. According to Foy, the percentage of patients hospitalized for a tenderness attack was only 0,11 percent a week after being seen in the difficulty room and only 0,33 percent 190 days after being seen.

Patients who did not have approve noninvasive tests were no more likely to have a heart attack than those who did hear testing, the researchers found. Patients who received these tests, however, were more promising to have invasive procedures such as angioplasty. Yet these procedures did not get better the odds against having a heart attack. In an editor's note that accompanied the study, Dr Rita Redberg, editor-in-chief of JAMA Internal Medicine, said such tests in low-risk patients are expendable and drag term spent in the ER. "It is regulate to change our guidelines and practice for treatment of chest pain in low-risk patients.

Such patients should be given a tight follow-up appointment with a primary mind physician who can determine, based on the patient's condition, whether further figuring is necessary". But Dr Gregg Fonarow, a professor of cardiology at the University of California, Los Angeles, said since the examination researchers looked back at patients who went to the exigency room and used statistics from insurance companies, the true value of these tests can't be definitively determined keepskinclear.com. Studies looking at patients in physical time emergency to be done to identify the value of these tests for low-risk chest hurt patients.

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий